<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for pro photo life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prophotolife.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prophotolife.com</link>
	<description>professional photo techniques for all photographers</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on how many megapixels are enough? by Jim Talkington</title>
		<link>http://prophotolife.com/2008/08/19/how-many-megapixels-are-enough/#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Talkington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotolife.com/?p=767#comment-1411</guid>
		<description>For my personal work, 6 MP is perfectly fine. I like printing 6" x 9" and rarely crop an image, preferring to print full frame. 

The studio is a pretty different world. Art Directors seem to want the best of both worlds, always saying "shoot looser, leave more room around the subject so there's plenty of bleed and I can move it around in the layout". Then, two days later, they point to some little detail and say, "now, I can blow that part up to full page, can't I?". Uh, yeah, right...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my personal work, 6 MP is perfectly fine. I like printing 6&#8243; x 9&#8243; and rarely crop an image, preferring to print full frame. </p>
<p>The studio is a pretty different world. Art Directors seem to want the best of both worlds, always saying &#8220;shoot looser, leave more room around the subject so there&#8217;s plenty of bleed and I can move it around in the layout&#8221;. Then, two days later, they point to some little detail and say, &#8220;now, I can blow that part up to full page, can&#8217;t I?&#8221;. Uh, yeah, right&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on how many megapixels are enough? by Rob</title>
		<link>http://prophotolife.com/2008/08/19/how-many-megapixels-are-enough/#comment-1409</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotolife.com/?p=767#comment-1409</guid>
		<description>Another thought, Mike-

I will often capture an image that looks much better when cropping serves to change the aspect ratio - get to pretend I own one of those high end medium format digital backs.  That may never happen, but a nice square photo does the trick from time to time.  The additional MPs help preserve a good sized print.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thought, Mike-</p>
<p>I will often capture an image that looks much better when cropping serves to change the aspect ratio - get to pretend I own one of those high end medium format digital backs.  That may never happen, but a nice square photo does the trick from time to time.  The additional MPs help preserve a good sized print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on revisiting OS X vs. Vista by Elizabeth Gower</title>
		<link>http://prophotolife.com/2008/08/14/revisiting-os-x-vs-vista/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Gower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotolife.com/?p=694#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>I have a Lenovo Thinkpad with CS3 extended and Vista. I love Vista and have had no problems at all with it. Good luck with your pc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Lenovo Thinkpad with CS3 extended and Vista. I love Vista and have had no problems at all with it. Good luck with your pc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on how many megapixels are enough? by Mike C</title>
		<link>http://prophotolife.com/2008/08/19/how-many-megapixels-are-enough/#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotolife.com/?p=767#comment-1405</guid>
		<description>Rob, I'm with you on cropping if the shot is good or if you got a great expression, but didn't have time to compose because it was i spur of the moment thing. What I was trying to say is that justifying a camera purchase based on MPs for cropping is setting yourself up for a disaster. But cropping an occasional shot or shooting loose so the client has play room is by no means a faux pas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, I&#8217;m with you on cropping if the shot is good or if you got a great expression, but didn&#8217;t have time to compose because it was i spur of the moment thing. What I was trying to say is that justifying a camera purchase based on MPs for cropping is setting yourself up for a disaster. But cropping an occasional shot or shooting loose so the client has play room is by no means a faux pas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on how many megapixels are enough? by Mark from Australia</title>
		<link>http://prophotolife.com/2008/08/19/how-many-megapixels-are-enough/#comment-1403</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark from Australia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotolife.com/?p=767#comment-1403</guid>
		<description>I couldn't care less about MP . I have had work published from my old 640 X 480 sensor point and shoot.  from 2mp , 4 mp  8 mp and now from my Canon Digital Rebel. I have even made acceptable 8 foot tall posters from the Canon.

Firstly I look for Ease of use. I have big hands and some buttons are just in the wrong place on some cameras. even the Digital rebel is not perfectly laid out for my fingers but I am getting there! 

Next I look for versatility. I still shoot every day with a point and shoot but it has a superb range of settings that when you get to know lets you create simply stunning photos. but it really peeves me that I forgot to check if it had a viewfinder even though it was definitely on my wish list so low light work is hit and miss. It is lucky I like surprises!

I have grown to love the Richness of colour and the relatively low noise of the Canon Digital Rebel compared to my previous cameras but I didn't even consider that till I bought it and discovered it for myself.

in the future I'd look for Bluetooth tethering, built in remote flash syncronisation(multi channel, improved Dynamic range, improved noise reduction, improved resolution (not necessarily more MP) and faster memory chip uploads and downloads.

in the software dept it would be nice if we couled upload software packs to the camera.... eg If i want to develop my skills with the ZONE system it would be nice if the camera had a tutorial mode and  s ZONE system assist mode.

THis could be incorporated with a more advanced in viewfinder HUD.

Maybe I should work for canon and teach those  guys about how creativity starts in the head!

thanks for a fab blog and tutorials</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t care less about MP . I have had work published from my old 640 X 480 sensor point and shoot.  from 2mp , 4 mp  8 mp and now from my Canon Digital Rebel. I have even made acceptable 8 foot tall posters from the Canon.</p>
<p>Firstly I look for Ease of use. I have big hands and some buttons are just in the wrong place on some cameras. even the Digital rebel is not perfectly laid out for my fingers but I am getting there! </p>
<p>Next I look for versatility. I still shoot every day with a point and shoot but it has a superb range of settings that when you get to know lets you create simply stunning photos. but it really peeves me that I forgot to check if it had a viewfinder even though it was definitely on my wish list so low light work is hit and miss. It is lucky I like surprises!</p>
<p>I have grown to love the Richness of colour and the relatively low noise of the Canon Digital Rebel compared to my previous cameras but I didn&#8217;t even consider that till I bought it and discovered it for myself.</p>
<p>in the future I&#8217;d look for Bluetooth tethering, built in remote flash syncronisation(multi channel, improved Dynamic range, improved noise reduction, improved resolution (not necessarily more MP) and faster memory chip uploads and downloads.</p>
<p>in the software dept it would be nice if we couled upload software packs to the camera&#8230;. eg If i want to develop my skills with the ZONE system it would be nice if the camera had a tutorial mode and  s ZONE system assist mode.</p>
<p>THis could be incorporated with a more advanced in viewfinder HUD.</p>
<p>Maybe I should work for canon and teach those  guys about how creativity starts in the head!</p>
<p>thanks for a fab blog and tutorials</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on how many megapixels are enough? by Rob</title>
		<link>http://prophotolife.com/2008/08/19/how-many-megapixels-are-enough/#comment-1402</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotolife.com/?p=767#comment-1402</guid>
		<description>Mike C-

In the perfect world, I agree with you 100%.  But as we all know, when you finally identify that "primo shot" of the 200 you to put on a card, a bit of cropping may be needed.  Within the last few weeks Jim put up some great pre-cropped shots of an actor in a variety of costumes.  So if that one great expression was otherwise in need of cropping, you trash the shot?  I like the extra MPs if I need to crop a bit.  "Hope for the best; plan for the worst."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike C-</p>
<p>In the perfect world, I agree with you 100%.  But as we all know, when you finally identify that &#8220;primo shot&#8221; of the 200 you to put on a card, a bit of cropping may be needed.  Within the last few weeks Jim put up some great pre-cropped shots of an actor in a variety of costumes.  So if that one great expression was otherwise in need of cropping, you trash the shot?  I like the extra MPs if I need to crop a bit.  &#8220;Hope for the best; plan for the worst.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on how many megapixels are enough? by Mike C</title>
		<link>http://prophotolife.com/2008/08/19/how-many-megapixels-are-enough/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotolife.com/?p=767#comment-1401</guid>
		<description>I don't buy the "I need megapixels so I can crop" argument. Crop in camera. Crop when before taking the picture. Be aware of your surroundings and the edges of your frame. It'll make you a better photographer in the long run. And save time in post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t buy the &#8220;I need megapixels so I can crop&#8221; argument. Crop in camera. Crop when before taking the picture. Be aware of your surroundings and the edges of your frame. It&#8217;ll make you a better photographer in the long run. And save time in post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on how many megapixels are enough? by matt haines</title>
		<link>http://prophotolife.com/2008/08/19/how-many-megapixels-are-enough/#comment-1400</link>
		<dc:creator>matt haines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotolife.com/?p=767#comment-1400</guid>
		<description>I'm bothered by the "is it 6 or is it 12 megapixels" question of my Fujifilm S5 Pro. If I have to do a serious crop on an image, there goes any potential of a 16x20 print sale. On the other hand, the pictures are gorgeous. I'm spoiled by how nice they look, and the exposure leeway I have when shooting under harsh conditions (such as moving two year olds who won't stay near the strobes).

So yes, megapixels or lack thereof are very important to me. But 10 or 12 would work nicely…I don't need 25 or anything crazy like that. Just enough to crop and sell a large print, that's all I ask. But there's no new digital in my future for awhile. :( And then it probably wouldn't look as nice as the Fuji. Just bigger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m bothered by the &#8220;is it 6 or is it 12 megapixels&#8221; question of my Fujifilm S5 Pro. If I have to do a serious crop on an image, there goes any potential of a 16&#215;20 print sale. On the other hand, the pictures are gorgeous. I&#8217;m spoiled by how nice they look, and the exposure leeway I have when shooting under harsh conditions (such as moving two year olds who won&#8217;t stay near the strobes).</p>
<p>So yes, megapixels or lack thereof are very important to me. But 10 or 12 would work nicely…I don&#8217;t need 25 or anything crazy like that. Just enough to crop and sell a large print, that&#8217;s all I ask. But there&#8217;s no new digital in my future for awhile. <img src='http://prophotolife.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> And then it probably wouldn&#8217;t look as nice as the Fuji. Just bigger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on how many megapixels are enough? by P Nym</title>
		<link>http://prophotolife.com/2008/08/19/how-many-megapixels-are-enough/#comment-1398</link>
		<dc:creator>P Nym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotolife.com/?p=767#comment-1398</guid>
		<description>I agree with Rob above. Cropping, not print size, is likely the key impact of megapixel count for most people. 

Being new to DSLR's (and photography in general), I chose not to fall for the oft quoted 'megapixel myth' and picked up a Nikon D40 (6MP). Given its large photosensors, 1/500 flash sync and great usability, I am having a ball learning to shoot. It is really a fantastic (beginner) camera.  However, I tend to crop aggressively and, just a couple of months in, I am already feeling constrained by the low pixel count. So much so, that I'm already considering upgrading to a higher MP sensor ... fully aware that I'm likely to lose that fantastic 1/500 sync. 

... bring on that D90! ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Rob above. Cropping, not print size, is likely the key impact of megapixel count for most people. </p>
<p>Being new to DSLR&#8217;s (and photography in general), I chose not to fall for the oft quoted &#8216;megapixel myth&#8217; and picked up a Nikon D40 (6MP). Given its large photosensors, 1/500 flash sync and great usability, I am having a ball learning to shoot. It is really a fantastic (beginner) camera.  However, I tend to crop aggressively and, just a couple of months in, I am already feeling constrained by the low pixel count. So much so, that I&#8217;m already considering upgrading to a higher MP sensor &#8230; fully aware that I&#8217;m likely to lose that fantastic 1/500 sync. </p>
<p>&#8230; bring on that D90! &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on how many megapixels are enough? by Rob</title>
		<link>http://prophotolife.com/2008/08/19/how-many-megapixels-are-enough/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prophotolife.com/?p=767#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>What about cropping?  I will often crop out unwanted items from the edge of photos, and would therefore much rather start with the higher MP count, assuming similar pixel density.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about cropping?  I will often crop out unwanted items from the edge of photos, and would therefore much rather start with the higher MP count, assuming similar pixel density.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
